This teacher's manual is for review only. If you would like to purchase this case study, go to the case study product page.
The public disagreements between the Commissioner of FDA and the Secretary of Health and Human Services which came to a head in the 2012 decision to dispense contraceptive pills over the counter. It was symbolic of the historically tense relationship which existed between the two bodies. The case discusses the history of FDA and the events and regulations which led to its role as a regulator of enormous importance and power. The case explores the factors leading to the divergent motivations and differences in points of view of FDA and the health officials at the White House and gives a chronology of similar disagreements.
The case addresses the question of division of power and intervention by the government and independent regulatory bodies against a backdrop of vague and broad statutes.
This product also includes a B case epilogue to the Plan B controversy.
This Teacher's Manual aids instructors in the use of the case study Margaret Hamburg and the FDA in the classroom. The Teacher's Manual consists of:
Summary Teaching Plan
The case study is designed to introduce students to the topic, then stimulate active engagement by situating participants in the role of the prosecutor. This case is suitable for one or two class sessions, and was initially taught in one class session for an hour and a half.
Class discussion includes:
Administrative Law, FDA, public health, role of regulators and the government
Geographic: United States
Event Start Date: 2012
For hard copies, please contact the HLS Case Studies Program at email@example.com or +1-617-500-1038.
To obtain accessible versions of our products for use by those with disabilities, please contact the HLS Case Studies Program at firstname.lastname@example.org or +1-617-500-1038.