Please note that each purchase of this product entitles the purchaser to one download and use. If you need multiple copies, please purchase the number of copies you need. For more information, see Copying Your Case Study.
The public disagreements between the Commissioner of FDA and the Secretary of Health and Human Services which came to a head in the 2012 decision to dispense contraceptive pills over the counter. It was symbolic of the historically tense relationship which existed between the two bodies. The case discusses the history of FDA and the events and regulations which led to its role as a regulator of enormous importance and power. The case explores the factors leading to the divergent motivations and differences in points of view of FDA and the health officials at the White House and gives a chronology of similar disagreements.
The case addresses the question of division of power and intervention by the government and independent regulatory bodies against a backdrop of vague and broad statutes.
This product also includes a B case epilogue to the Plan B controversy.
Administrative Law, FDA, public health, role of regulators and the government
Geographic: United States
Event Start Date: 2012
For hard copies, please contact the HLS Case Studies Program at email@example.com or +1-617-500-1038.
To obtain accessible versions of our products for use by those with disabilities, please contact the HLS Case Studies Program at firstname.lastname@example.org or +1-617-500-1038.
Watermarked educator copies and a teacher's manual for this product are available free of charge to educators and staff of non-profit institutions. A teacher's manual is available free of charge to for-profit trainers. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to these materials.