In December 1999, the Recording Industry Association of America brought suit against Napster, a peer-to-peer file-sharing company for downloading music. With the new millennium came a spree of other suits against similar companies, with the RIAA often emerging victorious. However, the lawsuits failed to stamp out peer-to-peer downloading, which transitioned to open source software that could not be linked to specific software developers. The lawsuit spree didn’t end either: instead, the recording industry sued the downloaders.
This background note surveys the evolution of peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing and copyright infringement suits, and highlights the plight of consumers in the United States’ rare statutory damages regime. Readers will become versed in the precedent cases, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and the basic technology of P2P and torrenting. The note sparks readers to envision a future for end users and fair use of digital content.
NOTE: This case is an adaptation of From Sony to SOPA: The Technology-Content Divide, also available from HLS Case Studies.
Copyright, intellectual property, statutory damages, peer-to-peer file-sharing, recording industry, fair use
Geographic: United States
Industry: Technology, Music
Event Start Date: 1984
For hard copies, please contact Lisa Brem E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Ph: +1-617-495-8689
Registered members of this website can download this product at no cost. For more information about the Case Studies Program at Harvard Law School, or to request a teaching note for this case study, contact the Case Studies Program at HLSCaseStudies@law.harvard.edu or 617-495-8689.