In 2008, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict escalated with Israel’s airstrikes and ground operations known as Operation Cast Lead. The UN Human Rights Council launched an investigation into Cast Lead, citing reports about the disproportionate nature of the casualties (14 Israelis compared to 1,166 Palestinians). Jewish South African jurist Richard Goldstone agreed to head up this investigation, officially known as the Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict.
The US and Israel protested the investigation, arguing that the Human Rights Council (and its predecessor, the Commission on Human Rights) had historically placed disproportionate scrutiny on Israeli military operations in Palestinian territories. Even through Israel refused to cooperate with the investigation, Goldstone continued the mission, producing a 574-page document that the press dubbed the "Goldstone Report."
This case study examines the chronology of the fact-finding mission and the decisions Goldstone made before, during, and after the publication of the Goldstone Report. Students are asked to ponder how Goldstone could have navigated the landscape of competing truths and to what extent he should publicly defend his findings. This is a follow-up case to the "A" case and gives details about the actions Goldstone took in response to the public backlash.
International Law, Human Rights Investigations, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Leadership, United Nations
Geographic: Gaza Strip, Israel, United Nations
Event Start Date: 2008
For hard copies, please contact Lisa Brem E-mail: email@example.com; Ph: +1-617-495-8689
Registered educators can download watermarked review copies of this product at no cost. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to these materials. For more information about the Case Studies Program at Harvard Law School, or to request a teaching note for this case study, contact the Case Studies Program at HLSCaseStudies@law.harvard.edu or 617-495-8689.