Loading... Please wait...

Image 1

Reputation, Credibility, and the Goldstone Report (B)

By:
 Philip Heymann, Taylor Lane, and Lisa Brem   (Published: 2013)
Product number:
CSP005
Length:
5 pages
English:
PDF
Product Type:
Case
Link to Faculty Author Page:
Link to Free Educator Copy:

Abstract

In 2008, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict escalated with Israel’s airstrikes and ground operations known as Operation Cast Lead. The UN Human Rights Council launched an investigation into Cast Lead, citing reports about the disproportionate nature of the casualties (14 Israelis compared to 1,166 Palestinians). Jewish South African jurist Richard Goldstone agreed to head up this investigation, officially known as the Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict.

The US and Israel protested the investigation, arguing that the Human Rights Council (and its predecessor, the Commission on Human Rights) had historically placed disproportionate scrutiny on Israeli military operations in Palestinian territories. Even through Israel refused to cooperate with the investigation, Goldstone continued the mission, producing a 574-page document that the press dubbed the "Goldstone Report."

This case study examines the chronology of the fact-finding mission and the decisions Goldstone made before, during, and after the publication of the Goldstone Report.  Students are asked to ponder how Goldstone could have navigated the landscape of competing truths and to what extent he should publicly defend his findings. This is a follow-up case to the "A" case and gives details about the actions Goldstone took in response to the public backlash.

Learning Objectives

  • Discuss a leader’s options, ethics, and the potential repercussions when undertaking highly controversial investigations.
  • Analyze how international law could or should play a role in international military conflicts.
  • Understand the objectives and precedents of the United Nations Human Rights Commission and assess the appropriate intervention into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • Understand the points of view of various stakeholder groups, and discuss how best to balance state sovereignty, international impartiality, and human rights responsibilities of Israel, Palestine, and the United Nations.

Subjects Covered

International Law, Human Rights Investigations, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Leadership, United Nations

Setting 

Geographic: Gaza Strip, Israel, United Nations

Event Start Date: 2008

Hard Copy

For hard copies, please contact Lisa Brem E-mail: lbrem@law.harvard.edu; Ph: +1-617-495-8689

Educator Materials

Registered educators can download watermarked review copies of this product at no cost. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to these materials. For more information about the Case Studies Program at Harvard Law School, or to request a teaching note for this case study, contact the Case Studies Program at HLSCaseStudies@law.harvard.edu or 617-495-8689.


Quantity

Registered User?

Sign in now


Not a User?

Create an account


Instructors can apply for Educator Access. Benefits include:
Benefits Include:

  • Educator Copies
  • Teaching Notes
  • Student Pricing

Contact us for more information.

Related case studies and educator materials